- WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING SOFTWARE LICENSE
- WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING UPDATE
- WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING LICENSE
Intel has been emitting fluoride for years without state knowledge, permit. Here is one example of what I have learned, from a 2013 news story: What I know about Intel management is from talking with Intel employees, sometimes at conventions, sometimes at social events not connected with technology, visiting an Intel campus during an open house event, and from news stories. It seems to me that the business side of Intel is not being managed well. The issue is that was done in a way that Intel has kept hidden, and in a way that customers who don't need that feature are not allowed to understand and cannot control. Intel SHOULD be "richly rewarded" for that. "Intel has been richly rewarded for implementing ME and with AMD implementing similar backdoors." What are the legal issues? Can you recommend Intel or AMD hardware without telling the managers of your company or your customers that the hardware is not secure? Could you go to prison for knowingly selling insecure hardware without informing the customers in a way that causes them to fully understand? Suppose a company loses millions of dollars because Intel hardware you recommended was found to be hackable, especially since that kind of vulnerability has already happened. In fact, however, they have discussions like this one and have a huge amount of power. It is common, I've observed, that technically-knowledgeable people believe they should not get involved with social issues. what are the geeks (such a small market that it can not be measured) going to do about it?" "Our feelings are not doing any financial or reputational damage to the Intel brand."
WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING UPDATE
(Nov 22, 2017) Intel's reaction: Intel Management Engine Critical Firmware Update (Intel-SA-00086). (May 8, 2017)ĭid the present managers lack the social ability to understand that it was likely that hackers would find defects in the Intel Management Engine? One article: Intel Patches Major Flaws in the Intel Management Engine. Intel was told that there would be problems: Intel's Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it. The world was told more than 3 years ago about the hidden control: Secret of Intel Management Engine by Igor Skochinsky. Most of the technology development parts of Intel has seemed healthy to me it's the business management that is failing, apparently. Maybe other Intel managers should be replaced, also. (The world needs AMD to stay healthy, also.)ĭid the present Intel managers lack the social ability to understand that providing hidden access for hidden invaders would damage Intel's reputation? Apparently Intel needs a new CEO. It is EXTREMELY important for the entire world, in my opinion, that Intel stay healthy. That would be a very, very bad conclusion to the very, very bad management by Intel. It seems that, if Intel continues to try to force spyware on customers, Intel will eventually go bankrupt. Or maybe the equivalent of a billion dollar ad campaign against Intel.Ĭustomers don't want spyware. "ME is turning into a colossal dumpster fire." (Probably because they want to keep the inside of the ME secret.) Thus not only is Minix3 the most installed OS on our recent x86 CPUs - but it might also the most pirated OS on our recent x86 CPUs!
WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING LICENSE
The Minix3 operating system license requires a legal notice, but so far it seems like Intel has not given the necessary legal notices. This is exactly what Intel seems to have done with the Intel ME.
WHAT IS INTEL MANAGEMENT ENGINE COMPONENTS SPYING SOFTWARE LICENSE
If you do so, then you are not complying with the Free Software license and you are committing a copyright infringement! This means that it's not possible to hide and keep secret the existence of Free Software that you have stuck into your product that you distribute. The legal notice usually contains the copyright holder's name and the license text. Slashdot reader anjara) writes:Īlmost all Free Software licenses (BSD, MIT, GPL.) require some sort of legal notice (legal attribution) given to the recipient of the software, both when the software is distributed in source and in binary forms. Software engineer (and IP Watchdog contributor) Fredrik Ohrstrom (a.k.a.
0 kommentar(er)
